Advocates of New Sex-Ed Curriculum Decline to Answer Bogus Questions
Should we respond to the silly post at the Ex-Recall blog, where they had a guy email us some loaded questions, and we sent him a polite response, saying we were just parents, and not experts on education, and he could find the answers to his questions on Google, and then Ex-Recall posted that private email on the web along with some kind of rambling "rebuttal"?
Naw. Readers can see what's going on there. If someone wants to start a dialogue, that's cool, but ... this wasn't that.
Naw. Readers can see what's going on there. If someone wants to start a dialogue, that's cool, but ... this wasn't that.
posted by JimK at 7:37 PM
9 Comments:
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
As previously stated: moron's comments will be deleted.
You want to talk with us? We love it. Challenge us, question us, prove us wrong, fine, we welcome your comments.
You wanna be a sarcastic idiot? I think you know where to do that. It's not here.
Can't take the truth, huh Jimbo?
Truth is fine. Humor is fine. Speculation is fine, and opinions are fine. Sarcasm and stupidity are not fine. If you can't tell the difference, then go someplace else.
Newspapers don't accept letters from people who don't use their names.People also need to give their address or neighborhood and phone numbers- people who post as anon- well, I think it is suspect. It is true that
there are places where you can post any idiocy/bigotry/foul words you want- Yahoo message boards- so Anon, git on over there.
Andrea Kline
All you 'do' is sarcasm. Cut me a break!
That's a mighty vague accusation, there, Anon.
It's not vague at all Jim. You know exactly what I mean -- and the people who read this blog do too -- you are sarcastic in your tone with most everything that has to do with CRC or people that you deem in 'opposition' to you. You can hear the sneering in your written word.
I guess I was hoping you would be more specific, instead of even more vague.
Post a Comment
<< Home