Peer Review: The End
I talked with the editor of the Journal of Psychology and Christianity this afternoon, and I have looked at a lot of papers and tables of contents and reference sections and vitas and things (today's Columbus Day, no work, I goofed off at the computer most of the day). I decided I am comfortable with what I said about peer-review a couple of days ago. Just needed to check some stuff to be sure.
posted by JimK at 8:44 PM
7 Comments:
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Morons' comments will be deleted
Sorry, longstanding policy. Don't do it again.
JimK
I had no idea you had that policy considering the stuff I've seen on here.
I don't delete stuff very often.
People can take whatever point of view, as inarticulate or eloquent as they may be, whatever, that's all fun. And it's been nice lately to have a couple of voices here that want to argue the other side. They're wrong of course, but we're glad to have the contrast.
But if something is void of content, I do not like to leave it up here. It sets a bad precedent, and we could end up like you-know-who. Now and then we get a troll or moron, and I just click the button and ping -- they're gone.
JimK
Well, Jim, you need to to learn to occasionally laugh at yourself. I know the rest of us are.
As you can appreciate, I'm just trying to keep the conversation lively.
Enjoy.
I get lots of giggles out of this. But I'm not going to let this place get like ... some we've seen.
JimK
Hey, anon,
why don't you post something funny at the CRC forum- that is the most pathetic excuse for a blog ever. I tried a few times- but they didn't get that I was being sarcastic.
When I am in a long line at the Giant and they have World Weekly News("termites eat Eiffel tower")- I expect to see the source for the CRC
"news" items.
Post a Comment
<< Home