Blog Problems
The blog has been badly behaved today. It's too bad, too, because there were several developments that it would have been good to talk about. It appears that the fault is not Blogger's this time, but our web host, who ran out of disk space. They promise to move us to a new server within a couple of days.
Right now it's b-a-r-e-l-y working. Comments have been dead, I think -- I know for sure the "No-No" comments were blank, but I have been able to get that re-published. And I haven't seen any new comments appear all day, which would be weird, because lately we've had pretty good traffic in scintillating verbiage.
But it does look like it's limping along now, functioning somewhat.
Right now it's b-a-r-e-l-y working. Comments have been dead, I think -- I know for sure the "No-No" comments were blank, but I have been able to get that re-published. And I haven't seen any new comments appear all day, which would be weird, because lately we've had pretty good traffic in scintillating verbiage.
But it does look like it's limping along now, functioning somewhat.
posted by JimK at 4:56 PM
3 Comments:
Did you hear about Intelligent Design?
Pennsylvania?
Now that's what I call progress.
They keep calling Intelligent Design a "science" or at least similar to a scientific theory.
What's up with that?
The argument is so childish, "If science can't prove it, God did it!"
Show me God and I'll think about it.
What? No? Didn't think so.
Alex...I understand what you are trying to say but as a believer in God..I am offended by your comment.
They keep calling Intelligent Design a "science" or at least similar to a scientific theory.
"What's up with that?
The argument is so childish, "If science can't prove it, God did it!"
Show me God and I'll think about it.
What? No? Didn't think so."
Alex,
Think about this: we have trials of people for murder all the time, but the jury can't actually watch the murder occur. They judge whether it happened based on the evidence.
Our physical universe is devised and fine-tuned in such a way that it's ridiculous to think that it was an accident. Measurement and analysis of that fine-tuning is evidence. Same concept.
It's not just that evolution hasn't been proven and so ID must be right- it's that there is evidence of intelligence at work. We only point out evolution's lack of evidence because the scientific establishment acts like it such and open-and-shut case.
Post a Comment
<< Home