In Spite Of It All, People Are Good People
This post is just me telling you something that happened to me, nothing about any school district or anything, just a personal story. This weekend was my dad's 85th birthday, and all of us kids flew in to Arizona to surprise him. I checked a bag into the airport at National Airport, in Washington, and picked it up in Phoenix. When I got my bag off the carousel it was open. It had been unzipped, I suppose by government contractors who needed to inspect it in case I was shipping a bomb on the plane, but they hadn't bothered to close it again. But just a minute, let me go back to my story.
When I got off the plane at Sky Harbor, it turned out that there's really no advantage to reserving a shuttle. You walk up, you get the same service as if you called the day before. They call for the vehicle once you are physically present, either way.
My hotel was out in Mesa, a little ways from the airport, so I had to wait about a half an hour until they had enough people to make it worthwhile to drive out there.
When we finally took off, there were five of us in the car: the driver, a lady, and three guys. The other guys were both about my age, or at least in their forties. The lady was younger, mid-thirtyish, and the driver was a young black man.
I have never seen anything like this. Immediately, before we'd even left the airport, the talk turned to politics and the miserable state of our country. Normally strangers in a situation like this find something generic to discuss, something that won't offend anyone or embarrass them. But man, they went through it all, the national debt and what will happen if China refuses to lend us more money, who's going to run in 2008 (can you imagine if it's Hillary versus Condi? -- Nobody seemed too happy with that idea, though the lady thought it would be better to have a female President), gas prices and why we weren't prepared for this situation, the war in Iraq of course, Katrina...
One guy, who had seemed friendly at first, quickly dropped out of the conversation, and it is possible he was a Bush sympathizer of some sort, one of the stubborn thirty-two percent (the "backwash") who think this is how it's supposed to be. But the strange thing was, nobody cared if he was left out; this group was beyond the point where they would let the conversation be held hostage by one guy. I travel a lot, and usually these conversations are about 1.the weather, and 2.problems somebody had on their flight. The lady was asking what can we do about the situation in Africa, with the genocide -- she'd seen a TV special with George Clooney, and knew that people were upset about it, but the government wouldn't do anything about it.
"What we should do," she said, "Is to get all the countries together and go in there and straighten that situation out."
It came down to one person saying, "The fact is, our government couldn't do that, because they're incompetent."
Oh, and the idea that we would nuke Iran -- the people in the shuttle could only laugh. They know we'll probably do it, and it's so ridiculous, it's so un-American, it's so fake. "All options are on the table," we said, and we laughed uncomfortably, because it's more like a cartoon than real life.
It went like that.
In all these years I have never seen a conversation among absolute strangers in America that went this way.
They dropped me off first. The driver came back to get my stuff. I gave him a couple bucks extra and said, "Well, that was a more interesting conversation than most."
"Man," he said, "That's all I hear every day. You know, I don't say nothing, but if you ask me, we ought to take care of our own problems first, before we start telling other countries what to do." He wanted to keep talking, in fact he stood there going on and on, and I felt a little rude pulling myself away, but I wanted to get checked in.
Up in my room on the third floor, I thought I'd better check my bag in case anything was missing. At the airport I'd glanced, and saw the main stuff -- a couple of shirts, my cell-phone charger -- was there, so I wasn't too worried.
I opened the bag. Lying on top of my stuff was a little box of cards. Something sentimental my wife slipped in there, I figured, she does that sometimes, little notes and sweet things. Uh, no. It was a bunch of Pillsbury Dough-Boy greeting cards with recipes on them. And under that, a section of the San Francisco Chronicle, with the "Bay Area's 100 Best Restaurants." And next to that, a green sweatshirt I'd never seen before. All my stuff was there, plus these other things.
Welcome to the post-9-11 world. A billion bags a month they look at (I'm just guessing, but there's a whole bunch), a million people a day through the metal detectors, all this serious stuff about not joking while you're walking through. Random searches, pat-downs, women to search the women and men to search the men, and not one terrorist has been stopped. I saw an old man a couple of weeks ago get caught by an airport beagle, trying to smuggle an apple into the US from England. That's it, apples. Oh, and they have to x-ray your shoes, of course. And did you know, fingernail clippers are OK now, but lighters aren't? This is the least effective tactic imaginable for making anybody safer, and they don't really care, and it shows.
My whole family was "randomly" selected to be pulled aside recently, to have some idiots go through everything in our carry-on bags. Come on, I'm going to blow up a plane with my wife and kids on it?
We don't complain, we just go along with all of it. We don't expect to be treated with respect. They open your bag, they dump the stuff out, they mix it up with somebody else's stuff, they don't bother to zip it again. Because you might have been a terrorist. You weren't, this time, but you might have been. Well, nobody ever is, but ... it could happen, and it doesn't matter if that's your stuff in your bag or somebody else's -- you're all just potential terrorists anyway.
I don't think people can live like this, and I think it's starting to change. A whole generation of Americans is learning a big lesson. Fear is not a way of life, it is not a rational reaction to a catastrophe. Fear does not give you guidance for making decisions, it only makes you stupid. People want to like one another, they want to laugh and love, and they're going to do that -- oh, they may hold it in for a while, maybe even a couple of years, but in the long run, people are good people.
When I got off the plane at Sky Harbor, it turned out that there's really no advantage to reserving a shuttle. You walk up, you get the same service as if you called the day before. They call for the vehicle once you are physically present, either way.
My hotel was out in Mesa, a little ways from the airport, so I had to wait about a half an hour until they had enough people to make it worthwhile to drive out there.
When we finally took off, there were five of us in the car: the driver, a lady, and three guys. The other guys were both about my age, or at least in their forties. The lady was younger, mid-thirtyish, and the driver was a young black man.
I have never seen anything like this. Immediately, before we'd even left the airport, the talk turned to politics and the miserable state of our country. Normally strangers in a situation like this find something generic to discuss, something that won't offend anyone or embarrass them. But man, they went through it all, the national debt and what will happen if China refuses to lend us more money, who's going to run in 2008 (can you imagine if it's Hillary versus Condi? -- Nobody seemed too happy with that idea, though the lady thought it would be better to have a female President), gas prices and why we weren't prepared for this situation, the war in Iraq of course, Katrina...
One guy, who had seemed friendly at first, quickly dropped out of the conversation, and it is possible he was a Bush sympathizer of some sort, one of the stubborn thirty-two percent (the "backwash") who think this is how it's supposed to be. But the strange thing was, nobody cared if he was left out; this group was beyond the point where they would let the conversation be held hostage by one guy. I travel a lot, and usually these conversations are about 1.the weather, and 2.problems somebody had on their flight. The lady was asking what can we do about the situation in Africa, with the genocide -- she'd seen a TV special with George Clooney, and knew that people were upset about it, but the government wouldn't do anything about it.
"What we should do," she said, "Is to get all the countries together and go in there and straighten that situation out."
It came down to one person saying, "The fact is, our government couldn't do that, because they're incompetent."
Oh, and the idea that we would nuke Iran -- the people in the shuttle could only laugh. They know we'll probably do it, and it's so ridiculous, it's so un-American, it's so fake. "All options are on the table," we said, and we laughed uncomfortably, because it's more like a cartoon than real life.
It went like that.
In all these years I have never seen a conversation among absolute strangers in America that went this way.
They dropped me off first. The driver came back to get my stuff. I gave him a couple bucks extra and said, "Well, that was a more interesting conversation than most."
"Man," he said, "That's all I hear every day. You know, I don't say nothing, but if you ask me, we ought to take care of our own problems first, before we start telling other countries what to do." He wanted to keep talking, in fact he stood there going on and on, and I felt a little rude pulling myself away, but I wanted to get checked in.
Up in my room on the third floor, I thought I'd better check my bag in case anything was missing. At the airport I'd glanced, and saw the main stuff -- a couple of shirts, my cell-phone charger -- was there, so I wasn't too worried.
I opened the bag. Lying on top of my stuff was a little box of cards. Something sentimental my wife slipped in there, I figured, she does that sometimes, little notes and sweet things. Uh, no. It was a bunch of Pillsbury Dough-Boy greeting cards with recipes on them. And under that, a section of the San Francisco Chronicle, with the "Bay Area's 100 Best Restaurants." And next to that, a green sweatshirt I'd never seen before. All my stuff was there, plus these other things.
Welcome to the post-9-11 world. A billion bags a month they look at (I'm just guessing, but there's a whole bunch), a million people a day through the metal detectors, all this serious stuff about not joking while you're walking through. Random searches, pat-downs, women to search the women and men to search the men, and not one terrorist has been stopped. I saw an old man a couple of weeks ago get caught by an airport beagle, trying to smuggle an apple into the US from England. That's it, apples. Oh, and they have to x-ray your shoes, of course. And did you know, fingernail clippers are OK now, but lighters aren't? This is the least effective tactic imaginable for making anybody safer, and they don't really care, and it shows.
My whole family was "randomly" selected to be pulled aside recently, to have some idiots go through everything in our carry-on bags. Come on, I'm going to blow up a plane with my wife and kids on it?
We don't complain, we just go along with all of it. We don't expect to be treated with respect. They open your bag, they dump the stuff out, they mix it up with somebody else's stuff, they don't bother to zip it again. Because you might have been a terrorist. You weren't, this time, but you might have been. Well, nobody ever is, but ... it could happen, and it doesn't matter if that's your stuff in your bag or somebody else's -- you're all just potential terrorists anyway.
I don't think people can live like this, and I think it's starting to change. A whole generation of Americans is learning a big lesson. Fear is not a way of life, it is not a rational reaction to a catastrophe. Fear does not give you guidance for making decisions, it only makes you stupid. People want to like one another, they want to laugh and love, and they're going to do that -- oh, they may hold it in for a while, maybe even a couple of years, but in the long run, people are good people.
26 Comments:
I agree with the main point of your post, Jim. A fearful viewpoint has begun to pervade our lives on many levels that is affecting the quality of our life.
Curious about your comments on international politics though. I'd love a little insight into this current thinking on the left. Seems like there is usually all this rhetoric about us interferring with other nations. In Iraq, for example, we removed a vicious dictator who used chemical weapons on his own people, assasinated anyone who dared disagree with him in any way and twice invaded neighboring countries without any justification. And yet, the left feels America was out of line. Now, here is the left marching to demand we intervene in Sudan.
Why the contradiction?
Anon, I don't know what "the left" is, if there is a "left," what they believe if there is such a thing.
If by "the left" you mean the people who don't believe the President should lie to us, don't believe we should attack random countries, and fear that the USA is being run into the ground by greed and incompetence, then ... I guess "the Left" is just about everybody. Well, more than two-thirds of the people, anyway. Unless Fox News is exaggerating. They don't do that, do they?
JimK
"you mean the people who don't believe the President should lie to us,"
?
"don't believe we should attack random countries,"
??
"and fear that the USA is being run into the ground by greed and incompetence,"
yeah, let's turn the whole thing over to Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Hillary Clinton- that'll take care of the incompetent fat cats
if we went into Sudan, and got stuck fighting terrorists for three years, you'd hear the same thing; there's a long term war being waged against us by Islamic fundamentalists- running away and cowering won't change a thing
Thank you for that, Anon.
JimK
I don't feel more secure because of TSA. I don't even think about planes blowing up though-I know I will be killed by an SUV or big truck on I-95 or the beltway.
I was traveling with 3 other colleagues- gov't employees- and we were pulled over as a group and searched separately before we got on the plane. I guess because 4 gov't employees traveling together is dangerous(wasteful, maybe- but these weren't GSA auditors). I actually said we are all from - well, I won't say -and pulled out my ID. That didn't matter- we were all still wanded and our carry-ons gone through by hand- after we had cleared the initial security check. An excellent use of TSA time.
This week, I am going on an 11 person agency review-they will probably send out the Hercules crew for us this time.
So, you would be for racial profiling ?
You may be interested to know that the govt is addressing it, but it is a system overhaul and takes time.
There is a program called US Visit that allows folks to get registered traveler cards - with biometric ids - iris, fingerprint, digital face photo - and will make the old TSA process virtually obsolete.
Pretty soon, you will no longer be able to enter the country without having your fingerprint taken - that is if you enter legally -
so the problem of 9/11 will simply not be able to happen again.
They are also adding cameras to the airport to randomly scan folks and crank it through a biometric id database to look for bad guys...
All long overdue, but hey, it is a system overhaul with a gigantic computer system and there is only so much you can accomplish in one and 1/2 adminstrations...
And I suppose all the TTF's will view this as a gigantic invastion of privacy... but you can't have it both ways.
...you can't have it both ways...
And -- what's the other way? You're saying we can't live in a free country where people trust one another and use common sense in deciding what's dangerous?
Theresa, let me ask you this: what color is the terror alert now?
Don't peek.
Do you know?
Do you know why you don't know? (Hint: let's expect it to start changing again in, oh, about September, I'll guess.)
JimK
PS By the way, I doubt that "racial profiling" would be part of it, unless you assumed that most terrorists were some particular race. I think most are ordinary-looking white guys, aren't they?
Hmmm...let's think.
Maybe we should start with young Arab males ?
Are you really arguing that Andrear and I and you should be searched as quickly as a young Arab male ?
Let's see....
It was young Arab males that flew the planes into the world trade center ... 19 out of 19, I believe.
And young Arab males responsible for the original bombing of the WTC during the Clinton admin.
And young Arab males who tried to sink the USS Cole (also during the Clinton admin)..
And, let's see, wasn't it young Arab males who were responsible for the attack on the US Embassy - and gee, that was during the Clinton admin as well.
So, you are correct Jim, searching my 78 year old mom on her way to heart surgery because she purchased a one way ticket at the last minute was a perfectly appropriate place to look for terrorists.
We do use profiling to determine which cars to stop on the way into the US from the southern border when those folks aren't typically out to kill us.
But it is not okay to use it in our airports against people who want to kill us. Great.
You are really trying to argue this position ? Please, give me a break.
Theresa, it sounds like you are only interested in Arab terrorists. That is unreasonable, since most of the terrorism in the US is not conducted by Arabs. Eric Rudolph, Tim McVeigh, William Krar ... these are regular-looking white guys. That does mean every regular-looking white guy is suspicious, I would hope the government has an idea who is involved in these groups -- I would hope they could use common sense in this. There was one attack on the US using hijacked airplanes, by Arabs. I can't tell if you are arguing in favor of racial profiling, like the TSA should only look at Arabs, which would be crazy, or what.
This seems to have touched a nerve for you, and I can't figure out what it is that has set you off. You want to use the airports to hassle Arabs, is that it? You want to use the whole thing to ... make Clinton look bad? I have re-read your comment severeal times, and don't see what you are trying to say.
JimK
Hi everybody!
If you want to understand why the Democrats will lose again in 2008 despite the polls, read Caitlin Flanagan's column in this week's Time. The final sentence really is a classic that TTF should take to heart, "It's the contempt, stupid."
Hope nobody feels "held hostage" by her opinion.
I still don't get it. Why should we intervene in Sudan but not in Iraq? What's the difference?
Homophobia is often expressed as
contempt.
Disguising hatred of gays in
religious terms is even more
contempt.
"It's the contempt, stupid" is a
warning that should be heeded by
those who preach, "love the sinner
but hate the sin."
WWJD?
I think you can see what JWD by reading the story of the woman being stoned for adultery. He would stop the stoning and say "go and sin no more" to the sinner.
Hope you read the column.
I am not suggesting racial profiling- I was traveling with two African American women and a white male- and I am a white woman of a "certain age". However,I think that 4 federal employees traveling together with their IDs and travel orders- after having passed the first search- should not be re-checked by hand. By showing my ID and orders- and if they asked- the IDs of the others- should have been enough. I later learned that there was some "alert" about small groups of terrorists- so of course, four federal employees are obviously the ones. I'm just saying that TSA is not efficient in use of resources and DHS- well, nevermind- Teresa and friends will want to defend that swamp- just because it was done by this administration. ?
Now my husband went to the airport without his driver's license- and he was given a big search and checked on the computer- I understand that.
By the way, I don't think terrorist attacks on our soil are the biggest threat to America right now.
"He would stop the stoning and say "go and sin no more" to the sinner."
When do you plan to stop stoning people you consider to be sinners?
Hey, maybe that same shadowy conspiracy that's trying to make premarital promiscuity look bad is trying to harass TTF members who travel.
"When do you plan to stop stoning people you consider to be sinners?"
Don't think I do. Discuss.
"Don't think I do. Discuss."
Think again. Look inside your heart and determine why you say the hateful things you say about gays.
I don't think I do. Let me know what your talking about and I'll consider it.
"... the notions that homosexuality is innate and that it is not disfunctional. These are ideas used by the gay affirmation movement..."
Your words are stones the anti-gay crowd uses to verbally stone homosexuals.
Jesus asked that the stoning be stopped, yet you persist.
Jim writes,
The lady was asking what can we do about the situation in Africa, with the genocide -- she'd seen a TV special with George Clooney, and knew that people were upset about it, but the government wouldn't do anything about it.
"What we should do," she said, "Is to get all the countries together and go in there and straighten that situation out."
Right there I would have asked this lady if she has ever seen the movie "Black Hawk Down", and if she had not I would tell her to see it first before recommending that we go in there and "straighten things out". And if she had seen it, I would ask her if she had paid any attention to the moral of the story...
I don't think people can live like this, and I think it's starting to change. A whole generation of Americans is learning a big lesson. Fear is not a way of life, it is not a rational reaction to a catastrophe.
Here in flyover country we are not afraid...though it can be a healthy reaction IF it motivates one towards self-preservation.
Fear does not give you guidance for making decisions, it only makes you stupid. People want to like one another, they want to laugh and love, and they're going to do that -- oh, they may hold it in for a while, maybe even a couple of years, but in the long run, people are good people.
That is the faith of a true liberal speaking, and I say this in a purely descriptive way as I know several liberals well enough to say that I love and adore them. However, this is not clear way of looking at human nature...it certainly is not cautious. I much prefer Alexander Solzhenitsyn's observation,
“The battleline between good and evil runs through the heart of every man.”
I think people have an equal capacity to do evil as well as good, and that an awareness of this universal human flaw has a better chance of making this world a better place than simply assuming that "people are good people". If there is anything that defines and sets a conservative apart from a liberal it is this distinction.
Best wishes on your father's 85th birthday.
Orin Ryssman
Fort Collins, CO
Interesting enough observation, Orin. Let me elaborate. Evil exists, let's say, at least selfishness and danger exist, and so a person or a society must maintain rigor. They must be able to resist the consequences of an evil action.
At the same time, it is every person's and every society's obligation to try to be good. If they don't, those who make up the larger context -- a society if we're talking about a person, or other societies -- will exert effort to at least minimize the negative consequences.
Beginning with the thought, "there is evil," one can choose to respond preemptively to it. One can defend oneself by doing evil first, out of self-interest.
That is is the state we find ourselves in today.
The problem with that is that even a "good" person performing evil behaviors is evil. There's a lot to consider there, about personal attributes vs situations etc, and I'm not going there.
The wise thing is to maintain a balanced rigor. Don't allow opportunities for evil to harm you, but don't behave in an evil way yourself. That's why the discussion needs both conserevatives and liberals. People want to be happy,, they do not want to think of themselves as evil, but they will perform evil deeds if they think they're justified.
JimK
I applaud your speaking up on this issue, Orin. I considered saying something similar but didn't. Jim's idea that everyone is basically good is an archaic notion widespread among the educated classes in the late 19th century. After the experience of the human race in the 20th century it's amazing that anyone would still hold this worldview.
Jim's view is not based on fact but on a faith in human goodness. It's a religion called secular humanism and is taught and promoted by most public schools.
"Your words are stones the anti-gay crowd uses to verbally stone homosexuals.
Jesus asked that the stoning be stopped, yet you persist."
Hey, anon, you're confusing everyone. I'm supposed to be the official TTF anon. I'm going to have start going by "Straw Man" (if I only had a brain)
Anyway, I'm always friendly with gay people and I'm not in favor of punishing them for engaging in unbiblical behavior- and certainly not executing them. Even here, where I often banter with TTFers, I've always found the few gay contributors to be a civil lot.
Your metaphor of words being equivalent to rocks of death isn't appropriate. Under your definition, Jesus would be stoning the woman by acknowledging that she sinned.
Can you give me an example of words I've posted here would be similar to stoning someone to death?
regards,
Straw "I would not just be a nothing" Man
"I'm always friendly with gay people and I'm not in favor of punishing them"
One of the most painful and deadly stones that is hurled at gay people today is denial of our right to form lifelong bonds through state sanctioned marriage. Denying us the right to marry the person we love is a form of punishment.
Ms. Flanagan said about Democrats "It's a party that supports gay families, as I do"
If you are truly not in favor of punishing us, do you, like Ms. Flanagan support gay families and our right to marry?
"One of the most painful and deadly stones that is hurled at gay people today is denial of our right to form lifelong bonds through state sanctioned marriage. Denying us the right to marry the person we love is a form of punishment."
You think govermental endorsement of your personal lifestyle is a right? And non-endorsement of your personal lifestyle is a painful and deadly stone?
"Ms. Flanagan said about Democrats "It's a party that supports gay families, as I do"
If you are truly not in favor of punishing us, do you, like Ms. Flanagan support gay families and our right to marry?"
Nope
Post a Comment
<< Home